Incorrectly raised the question.Ban is not - there is a restriction is justified in the present situation in the country.Prohibitions and restrictions are the same - a violation of the human right to freedom of movement."The current situation" is not in the legal terminology.There is martial law and state of emergency. - 11 months ago
Kiev and the Constitution - it is an anecdote to the two presidents:
in Ukraine in June 2014 there were two presidents: one illegally selected, the other - illegally expelled.
You the same thing.
According to the Constitution of Ukraine on mobilization.106 of claim 20
But if martial law, the first of the IMF will not give money, and secondly you need to officially recognize the war with Russia in third is no help from the United States, both in NATOarmament and for the money.
But even recognizing officially the war with Russia, the need to fight against it.And this is not genocide Donbass, Russia also will respond and respond really .
"Why Ukraine recognizing Russia as an aggressor would not attack the Crimea?"
"Because in Crimea really regular troops of the Russian Federation"
Here in this as in the past - have in the Donbass not Donetsk residents, as "terrorists" with a Ukrainian accent and Ukrainian passports and, if not "terrorists", the "separatists"
Debilizm Ukraine consists in the fact that even after the Ukrainians attacked Donbass, Blame it will be for them themselves donchane( terrorists, separatists. ..).
Same idiocy of Ukraine that when the sets "wins" APU, Kiev once again declares mobilization.