I love dogs and animals in general, but I think in this situation, my instinct of preservation and conservation of the most important instinct of my child would prevail over all, I would take a chance to survive and would eat dogs.Sitting at home now I'm fed up and happy and can hardly imagine how I would kill and eat pet dogs.But there in the stress of the situation, even passion, I think it would be there was a huge strength and my feelings in me would have been completely different.Second clear answer.Thank you. - 3 years ago
Why so complicate the task: Antarctica, predators that are out there, like, no, and other entourage?
I'll tell the story of life.My uncle in the Great Patriotic War of the environment came out with three companions.
Woods, of course, went.In winter.Food no.Even the leaves on the trees.
We went out to another group of soldiers.Sit around the campfire, roast meat.Well, they were treated.They ate.And then we find out that eating sobachatiny.Here who quietly took it, and my uncle was sick.Though it was brutally hungry, but. ..
But the dogs eat. .. True specially grown.As chickens.
So all of a person and depends on your situation.
General who comes up with the following tasks, like the war was not. ..
and other extreme situations, too, I guess.
you excuse me, nothing personal. ...
Just this story from childhood stuck in my head.Task invented by me, and yes, you're right, I was not in the war, that's so lucky.
In such a situation, if it is clear that there is no escape and will not be, so as not to suffer torture and no one, I'd probably immediately, at the same time, shoot all.Because dogs leave to suffer and die do not understand what death is also zhalko.Vot because of all try to shoot, at the end, themselves.With dogs and start.But, if is exactly clear what's ahead-besprosvet.Esli I feel that you can be saved, it will tear the claws are out, do not know how, but would prefer to cancel the kill.Intuition will tell, and there has already been made on the fate -Who save it, who do not have th'm not to blame.
Well, of course, dogs have to sacrifice.And this is a very long supply of food.So during this time will have to work hard and clear the passage.Furthermore, no sane person in such an expedition would not have left without means of communication.Even if the radio is broken, you can try to repair it.One thing I can say: I do not believe in the initial failure.If there is a will, time and few resources, this is a 50% success rate.And the rest will follow.Luck loves stubborn!One part of the problem - the absence of any "may be," "may" and other things.
1) if they have a fire - melt output easily
2) if they do not fire, they just freeze motionless before supplies run out
3) nor the son can not have a father or fatherson.What raw that roasted meat native person can not have
4) if the faithful dog, they all hunger is still not eat the host. .
5) I personally dogs to eat or what to eat, but also not to killcould.
So I think all of the options suggested above - disappearOne part of the problem - the absence of any "may be," "may" and other things.
First two options this is the inevitable sequence of actions!The only thing you should not do is to take the life itself, since faith is the last to die!Personally, I am in such a situation sacrificed dogs that would stretch even not much, but next to the expensive and precious to me a man with whom you can talk about everything and find out what I did not know before, life preaching!The main time, and time is life!
I would choose option 2: wait for help from nowhere, and extend the life of herself and the baby is simply meaningless.Of course, this is very sad, sorry baby, but we do not have the right to choose who will die for the sake of another.One part of the problem - the absence of any "may be," "may" and other things.
I wonder how the dog will be saved in the version number three?Before this perspective, the question was only in terms of loss of life and its processes to accelerate or extend.How suddenly salvation and why only dogs?Very wording suggests: first shoot himself, then shoot the child.If this is possible, then why should dogs and not be saved? - 3 years ago logical.But I need a little argument.Type - a zombie with demand. - 3 years ago
Selects the first answer, no matter how it was a pity the dogs, but by all means try to extend the life of your child and yourself, well and suddenly rescued or thrown down the cliff again and open the passage to freedom
I will choose the first option.Shoot and eat dogs.Because as long as there is hope alive is always something to change.And still alive and there are forces - is still going to fight, even if obviously there is no escape, and the situation seems completely hopeless.Because as soon I surrendered - has already lost.Even if still alive.
Survive at all costs!Here is my answer.Therefore dogs and shoot and just do, I will do everything you need to save the life of your child and yourself.But really if you do not get out, then choose the third option.Again, only in the case if the situation is really desperate to such sepeni. .. to death.
First of all, I hundred times check whether there is any opportunity to get out.These attempts will not leave until the end.Of course I do not want to sacrifice dogs, but if there will be no other choice - to somehow save her child, will have to sacrifice( but do not know how I can do it.) I'll try can somehow break through the weapons the way to the exit. ...Well I do not Know all You do not give up! !!!!!!!!!!!