Answer is in the question.Namely, the French will bomb Syrian territory without the consent of the Syrian government.Is it so difficult to comprehend?Repeat with the release:
Syrian government did not give permission to any French Air Force to bomb its territory.
The French need quite a bit.Following the example of Russia to enter in full cooperation with the Syrian government and coordinate their military operations with them( as well as with Russia), in the case of a positive response to Syria.
But not earlier.Any fighting foreign forces in the territory of a sovereign state will be regarded as hostile.And as a result, Syria could easily destroy any aircraft that will enter its airspace without permission.And also the Army that will invade Syria without asking.
Remind you that the UN did not give any mandate.Neither the French nor the British nor the Germans.Europe( and possibly America) will carry home zinc coffins.With killed on foreign soil for its citizens.__eleven_
Likely not mind, but because these areas bombed by Russian aircraft, the Franco-Russian compatible identification system "friend or foe" there and then downed Su-24 aircraft of any fear that you can not identify, and should be considered a threat and shoot down on teperyashnih statements, which really do not want anyone.
Therefore, diplomatic subterfuge to permit the Assad government - because now Syria bombed and sundry - the US, the Arabs, Australia,. .., today, and England joined without asking permission.
Most likely, over time, will be shared by the bombing of areas between the two countries.Nothing like that.
From a military point of view, appropriate and effective means to destroy not deliver oil, and its means of production.Destroy wells, pipelines and storage space in the field of oil extraction.It is easier to do with minimal effort.But all this is after the end of military operations will need to recover, it needs to be cash and equipment to Syria itself does not produce.And it puts Syria in dependence on other countries.There are problems with the environment, you will need to clean large areas from oil spills.Therefore, Russia and cons.I had some time to be destroyed Iraq oil fields of Kuwait, a huge number of minefields, could walk only cleared footpaths, lakes of oil that had been covered with sand on top of destroyed towers and pumping stations.Restoring it was very difficult.It should be noted that in this situation, Russia and France are thinking about the future of Syria, but the approach and purposes completely opposite.In one such chistoplyuystvom not engaged in the war.
Generally, all this military adventure( in other words not found in a dictionary) of Russia in Syria several durnovato smells, and the further, the worse.I understand that now the bait bunch of enemies, but say it is necessary.Not to whether Russia threw their forces into Syria to protect its own interests( eg, oil) under Syrian protection pretext, and is ready to bomb trucks with oil coming to Turkey in order to once and bombanut tower forever and close igilovtsam Allraspberries.This is exactly how to catch dog fleas alone, instead of once..... And the dog and all the fleas on her.And now that France is ready to bomb the towers, Russia suddenly became this against, although she could do it in the first place than to consider how many millions of dollars a day LIH obtained from the sale of the oil itself.And do not talk about the environment and other bullshit, on the contrary, Russia would be happy to heap new contracts and jobs to restore torn down economy.So, we do not need these jobs and contracts - no other choice.So the situation in Syria is far from unique.
First Russia dropped to Syria its forces after President Assad asked Russia for help, and secondly not very good to bomb the wrong oil sources without the consent of the owner - ie without the agreement with Syria - that it is Syria( Assad)I have to give the nod to the bombing of oil sources.Otherwise, it is the arbitrariness of the opponent's territory - more than a month ago